Wednesday, September 29, 2010

HILLVISTA CONDOMINIUM (NEW T.O.P. Nov 2010)

FREEHOLD
Stylish Balinese resort ambience
Located within the residential enclave of 1 Elizabeth Drive
Future Downtown MRT line- Hillview MRT station is mere minutes walk away
Ample of shopping mall nearby
In between Bukit Batok & Bukit Timah nature reserves
Located within the prestigious & serene Hillview residential enclave of 1 Elizabeth Drive, it is strategically located between 2 nature reserves of Bukit Batok & Bukit Timah providing perfect sanctuary for those seeking pure tranquility.

With its stylish Balinese resort ambience, Hillvista is a retreat for you to rejuvenate right in the comfort of your own home. The graceful poetry of water features at the main entrance will enchant you as you arrive. Natural colours & materials have been blended to harmonize with the environment. A variety of materials are cleverly used in the exterior & interior of each of the 127 FREEHOLD apartments.

Shaded by verdant foliage, the enchanting Hillvista is an ideal choice for those looking for luxurious facilities. Fashioned like a peaceful nature retreat on the outside, Hillvista is filled with landscape gardens of exotic tropical shrubs, each carefully cultivated.

Space & versatility were two of the words that came to mind when designing Hillvista. With the option of an open plan dry kitchen, the dining, living & cooking areas can be integrated - if you so wish - to make culinary events a sociable affair.

Sit back & relax under the timber trellises or at the Balinese pavilion. Feel the tranquil moment simply at home and away from the hustle & bustle of everyday life. Future Downtown MRT line- Hillview MRT station is mere minutes walk away. Live the resort life, only at Hillvista.

Nearby Amenities:
• Bukit Timah Plaza
• King Albert Park
• Beauty World Plaza
• Bukit Timah Shopping Centre
• Rail Mall
• Bukit Timah Nature Reserve

Property Facilities:
• Koi Pond
• Jacuzzi with Trellis
• Pools
• Gymnasium
• Jacuzzi
• Dining Pavilion with BBQ Pits
• Aqualounges
• Dining Pavilion
• Garden Pavilion
• Spa Pavilion
• Children play area
• Sunning Deck
• Fitness Station
• Foot Reflexology area
For more information, please contact me at +65 97938778 or email at property@ckgroup.sg

Friday, September 24, 2010

Landed homes get new profile in pilot project

Published September 17, 2010
 
New approach allows for more flexibility in how they are built

By KALPANA RASHIWALA

(SINGAPORE) The Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) is conducting a pilot project of modified guidelines that will allow more creative designs for landed homes.
The guidelines will apply to nine landed housing plots it will auction next month under Sembawang Greenvale Phase 3.
The guidelines do away with some of the current 'micro controls' such as the attic profile, floor-to- floor height and basement protrusions. Instead, it will merely control the envelop or the overall bulk of the house.
One fallout though is that the overall height limit of a three-storey house under the new approach is lower than under the old guidelines.
Singapore's planning authority said the new approach will give architects greater freedom to propose a variety of layouts and designs as long as the proposal is generally compatible with surrounding three-storey houses. For instance, one can propose more lofty spaces in certain parts of the house such as the living room and master bedroom in front, and have more compact spaces elsewhere - say, the study room or bedroom at the rear.
W Architects managing director Mok Wei Wei welcomed the new approach: 'It takes care of the big picture by controlling the envelop; in other words, the building shouldn't be bigger than what it should be. But within that, it relaxes some of the earlier controls like the maximum storey height. Under existing guidelines, the first storey has a maximum height of 4.5 metres, and the second and third storeys, 3.6 metres each.
'But now this maximum storey height control is removed. So it means you have a freer volumetric play of the space, while still allowing you to achieve the same overall built-up area as before. That's the greatest advantage.'
There is still a control of minimum storey height, so the minimum habitable standard is not sacrificed, he noted.
For a landed housing estate like Sembawang Greenvale, under the existing rules, one could stretch the total building height upto 17.7 metres for a three-storey house with an attic and a basement.
But under the envelop control approach - with an overall height of 15.5 metres, inclusive of the top 3.5 metres set back from the front and rear building facade - one can design a four-storey building and still have an attic and basement for the part of the house that one does not mind being compacted, Mr Mok says.
The 15.5-metre height limit is well calibrated to ensure excessive stories are not inserted within the new envelop that could lead to, for instance, a six-storey house. The proposed envelop height limit - which is based on dimensions of a typical three-storey house, says URA - will help address concerns that a house could resemble a flat if a 17.7-metre height limit were to be allowed.
The envelop control approach also does away with the existing control that the basement may protrude only upto one metre above the ground. The new approach allows a basement that is less deep and hence protrudes more above ground, which should result in cost savings for the owner.
URA's spokeswoman said that if the pilot project at Sembawang Greenvale is successful, the authority may consider extending the envelop control guidelines to landed housing developments in other locations or types of works such as additions and alterations of existing landed property.
The envelop control approach was the result of feedback during URA's Focus Group consultation exercise on landed housing in late 2007.

Changes to property tax act

Published September 17, 2010
YESTERDAY IN PARLIAMENT
 
No need to inform IRAS of improvements to property

By FELDA CHAY


PROPERTY owners will no longer need to inform the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) when they rebuild, enlarge, alter or conduct improvement works on their properties.
In one of three changes Parliament passed on the property tax act yesterday, IRAS will now obtain the necessary information - essential to re-assessing property tax - directly from other government agencies that have the information.
Two other amendments to the property tax act will see the fine tuning of the definition of 'structural networks', and reduction of the time limit for the recovery of property tax to five years from the current six years.
Lim Hwee Hua, Minister in the Prime Minister's Office and Second Minister for Finance and Transport, said that shortening the time limit to recover outstanding property tax 'is in alignment with the five year time-bar period for tax recovery under other Tax Acts', such as the income tax and GST tax acts. The change is set to kick in from January 2012.
On fine-tuning the definition of 'structural networks', Mrs Lim said that the definition should be made clearer 'for the avoidance of doubt, that even a single pipeline may be regarded as a structural network. Further, it will be made clear that property tax can be levied on the installed parts of a network that is currently in use or intended to be in use.' For example, a network of pipelines that has been installed but has yet to be put to active use is liable to property tax, she added.
Last week, IRAS said that its $2 billion property tax collection for FY 2009-2010 was 31 per cent lower than the FY 2008-2009 collection.

Stage set for upmarket property launches

Published September 22, 2010
Stage set for upmarket property launches
Next 9 months could see slew of mid-tier and high-end projects in market

By UMA SHANKARI


(SINGAPORE) Developers here plan to launch another 34 residential developments with more than 8,800 units by June 2011, data compiled by Knight Frank shows.
Most of the new projects rolled out will be mid-tier and high-end developments. Knight Frank's list shows that 21 out of the 34 possible launches are located in the upmarket districts of 1, 2, 4, 9, 10 and 11.
Developers BT spoke to trust that the latest round of government measures to dampen demand for private homes and HDB flats announced on Aug 30 will impact mostly mass market homebuyers.
They are hopeful that new launches, which are mostly for homes in the mid-tier, high-end and luxury segments, will see healthy take-ups.
'I believe that the hardest hit projects will be the mass market ones,' said EL Development managing director Lim Yew Soon. 'For the mid to high-end projects, the impact will be somewhat lesser.'
The large number of upcoming mid-tier and high-end developments is not a reaction to the latest round of property measures, developers and analysts said. Rather, having pushed out numerous projects targeted at upgraders, many property groups are left with pending mid-tier and high-end project launches.
CB Richard Ellis executive director Joseph Tan said that many developers who bought mass market sites launched them within nine-12 months, with some even pushing out their projects in six-seven months to ride on the exuberant upgrader market.
'The fourth quarter will see more of the mid to high-end launches,' Mr Tan said.
Added one developer: 'Most developers rushed to launch mass market projects last year when that segment of the market was very hot, so there are mostly mid-tier and high-end projects that are waiting to be launched now anyway.'
But, many developers did not want to commit to a firm launch date - even though in some cases, showflats are ready and brochures have been printed.
CapitaLand recently said that it will go ahead with the launch of its new 1,715-unit condominium on the former Farrer Court site in Farrer Road by the end of this year.
The chief executive of the group's Singapore residential arm, Wong Heang Fine, said that while the new government measures have created some 'flux' in the market, things should 'settle in a couple of months'.
The launch of the Farrer Road project will be closely watched as it is the largest single residential development likely to be offered to homebuyers in the near future.
CapitaLand is likely to hedge its bets by rolling out the development in phases, similar to what City Developments and the Hong Leong Group did with their 642-unit NV Residences in Pasir Ris.
EL Development's Mr Lim also said that he intends to launch his 115-unit freehold project on the site of the former Diamond Tower in Jalan Rajah, in the Balestier area, in Q1 2011. But, despite the more bullish outlook for the mid-tier and high-end segments, several large suburban projects will be launched soon.
Esparina Residences, a 573-unit executive condominium (EC) project at Sengkang by Frasers Centrepoint and Lum Chang Building Contractors, will be launched next month.
Major private suburban launches in Q4 2010 include Hoi Hup Sunway Property's 473-unit Vacanza @ East at Lengkong Tujoh; Far East Organization's 214-unit The Lanai at Hillview Avenue; and Keppel Land's yet-unnamed residential development at Lakeside Drive, which will have more than 600 units.
On Aug 30, the government said that it will now disallow concurrent ownership of HDB flats and private residential properties within the specified minimum occupation period.
Other measures were aimed at potential buyers of second homes. Those with an existing mortgage can now borrow only up to 70 per cent of a property's value for a second home, down from 80 per cent previously. They must also pay 10 per cent in cash, up from 5 per cent.
Developers and analysts said then that the measures will hit prices and sales of private homes, but mostly in the mass market segment

Chevron House sold for $547m

Published September 24, 2010
Chevron House sold for $547m
Goldman funds take big loss, sell property to Deka

By KALPANA RASHIWALA


(SINGAPORE) Chevron House at Raffles Place has been sold for $547 million to a fund managed by Deka Immobilien of Germany, taking the total value of Singapore office investment sales deals so far this year to nearly $3 billion.
Changing hands: The latest transaction price works out to $2,083 psf of net lettable area
The price for Chevron House works out to around $2,083 per square foot based on the building's existing net lettable area (NLA) of 262,650 sq ft, BT understands.
Chevron House, which was formerly known as Caltex House, is a 33-storey building on a site with a remaining lease of about 78 years.
The property is being sold by Goldman Sachs funds, which are walking away with a loss, having paid $730 million or about $2,780 psf for the property in 2007. That acquisition was funded mostly by a consortium of lenders headed by Standard Chartered. The latest transaction is slated for completion by late October, ahead of the expiry of the financing facility, sources say.
Chevron House is the second Singapore office property to be sold by Goldman Sachs funds lately following last month's $870.5 million divestment of DBS Towers One and Two along Shenton Way to Overseas Union Enterprise. Goldman reaped a profit from that transaction; it paid $690 million for the office blocks in 2005.
The US bank's funds also bought Hitachi Tower, behind Chevron House, in early 2008 for $811 million or about $2,900 psf of NLA. The 999-year leasehold office tower, fronting Collyer Quay, is expected to be put up for sale within the next few months given that the financing facility on the asset - also extended by a Stanchart-led consortium - is said to end early next year.
The Singapore office market has seen a steady rental recovery after the slump in the wake of the global financial crash.
'The fundamentals are attractive. Investors have realised this over the past three months and investor appetite has increased significantly. Parties looking to invest include Reits, other property funds and private investors. Appetites range from $100 million to $500 million-plus,' said a market watcher.
Deka, which is buying Chevron House, is a unit of DekaBank in Germany. The deal marks Deka's first major property acquisition in Singapore and is said to be at close to 4 per cent net yield. Chevron House is currently 98 per cent let. Major tenants include Chevron and Visa.
The property comprises a four-storey retail podium, 29-storey office tower and three basement levels. B1 has shops linked directly to the Raffles Place MRT Station, while B2 and B3 contain 96 carpark lots.
It is thought that the property was marketed through an expression of interest exercise which closed in the third week of August.
BT understands the exercise was well received and that about six parties were then shortlisted for due diligence and further negotiations, culminating in the sale to the Deka-managed fund.

Untitled Document

99-Year vs Freehold
Many factors, such as capital appreciation and rental yield, come into play
By Teo Kuan Yee
Published: September 21 2010,
Home & Decor
...............................................................................
One sure indicator of a red-hot property market is the way 99-year homes are being snapped up. Their prices are also skyrocketing faster than freehold units.

In the past, most home buyers would give leasehold homes the snub, thinking that freehold ones are superior in terms of long-term value.

A freehold title allows the homeowner to have perpetual ownership of the property, while a leasehold title allows possession for a stated number of years, be it 99 or 999 years. When the lease expires, the title of the property goes back to the state.

If the current price tags of some leasehold properties are any indication, it seems most buyers now don't give a hoot about whether the property is leasehold or freehold. One much-talked-about deal was a 99-year leasehold bungalow in Sentosa Cove that reportedly went to a foreign buyer at a jaw-dropping $36million (or $2,403 psf) in June.

In fact, the average prices of Sentosa Cove bungalows rose by 55 per cent to $1,959 psf in the second quarter of 2010, over the same period a year ago, according to a Savills property report.

Foreigners do not mind leasehold properties as the 99-year lease is still better than 60-year leases in Hong Kong and China. Sentosa is considered a mid- to above-mid-value property compared to Hong Kong, Shanghai and other cities. Besides, buyers today are purchasing properties based on concepts and lifestyle. Sentosa Cove with its unblocked sea view and yacht berth, coupled with Singapore's security, is in demand.

Familiar concept overseas

Contrary to the conservative mindset of many Singaporeans who believe that freehold homes are always better, the concept of leasehold ownership is widely accepted and common overseas, from the UK to Indonesia and China.

Many foreigners are used to leasehold tenure and hence, most of these buyers are not deterred (by the leasehold status in Singapore). Another strong pull factor is that Sentosa Cove is the only landed property available to foreigners. With the integrated resort in the vicinity, it has attracted many foreign investors.

The property's location was the key factor in the "buy" decision, while tenure was a lesser consideration.

In the past, the preference was for freehold over leasehold properties as they offered more value for money. Over time, people have changed their mindsets as leasehold properties now occupy prime locations with good capital appreciation.

For instance, price transactions of resale leasehold properties like The Sail, with its glorious view of the new Marina Bay skyline, have risen.

Soft launched in 2005 at an average $1,080 psf, prices soared to $1,800 psf, or $1.7 million for a two-bedroom 936sqf unit in 2009. Some units were recently transacted for $2.4 million ($2,800psf).

The Sail is an iconic building with a prestigious location and an unblocked view of the central business district and Marina Bay Sands. Prior to its launch, the developer had marketed the property worldwide. The Sail has a good rental yield of 4-7 per cent and a lot of investors are buying it as their second home, thus making the prices escalate. This continues to attract more foreign investors.

Should you join the bandwagon?

Experts we spoke to all agree on one thing for the home buyer - common sense should prevail.

Ultimately, every home buyer has to decide according to his budget and preference, such as spatial needs, says Nicholas Mak, real estate lecturer at Ngee Ann Polytechnic.

"For investors, leasehold properties usually offer a higher rental yield (because of their lower capital cost). But that merely compensates the owner for the decaying lease," he explains.

Based on his studies from the past decade, leasehold properties rose and fell by greater margins during a boom and downturn respectively (see chart above). This shows that on a whole, leasehold properties are more susceptible to the ups and downs of the economy, as compared to freehold titles.

"When the rise in the property market is from the bottom up, leasehold condominiums could outperform freehold ones. Conversely, if the boom is top-down, freehold units would deliver better results. However, the faster the rise, the harder the fall," he warns.

"Leasehold properties are attractive to buyers who plan to rent out their property as tenure has no effect on its attractiveness or the amount of rent it can command," says Tay Huey Ying, Collier International's director for research and advisory. As most 99-year properties cost less, you are also getting a higher rental yield.

But buying ageing leasehold units also has certain pitfalls.

"Be aware of the more restrictive financing available for such leasehold properties (beyond 40 years old) as this could affect their resale (potential)," warns Huey Ying.

For example, the CPF board only allows CPF funds to be used for 99-year homes with 30 or more years left on their lease.

"For remaining leases of between 30 and 59 years, CPF withdrawal limits will be pegged to the purchaser's age and the remaining lease of the property," she says.

Banks also want a healthy buffer for the remaining lease.

"Generally, banks might either reject or reduce the quantum of financing if the property has a remaining lease of less than 60 years at the point of application. The loan tenure may also be reduced if the remaining lease falls below 40 years on loan maturity, because the marketability of the property will be impacted as the lease shortens," says Phang Lah Hwa , head of Consumer Secured Lending at OCBC Bank.

It pays to shop around as the loan tenure period differs with bank policy.

"Our experience is that most banks require the property to have a minimum remaining lease of 30 to 40 years when the loan is fully repaid. For instance, if you bought a property with a 60-year remaining lease, the maximum loan period might be 20 years if the bank requires a minimum lease of 40 years. So if a bank requests for 30 years (of remaining lease), the maximum loan tenure would be 30 years," explains Dennis Ng, founder of Mortgage Consultancy Portal, www.HousingLoanSG.com.

This 10-year difference in the loan period would result in heftier monthly repayments.

Why pay a premium?

Thoughtful property pros consider the conflicting arguments for and against leasehold properties as splitting hairs.

Colin Tan, research director at Chesterton Suntec, sums up the argument succinctly: "The top priority for buyers who plan to occupy the units should be housing needs, not investment potential."

"If you need more space, consider leasehold. If you have spare cash, then consider freehold. When buying for investment, (ask yourself) which is your priority - rental returns or capital appreciation? If yield is important, buy leasehold. For capital appreciation, if you think the demand for freehold will grow faster than that for leasehold, then buy freehold."

Nevertheless, here's more food for thought. "The premium between the two depends on the number of buyers who prefer one over the other. In reality, the premium stops growing when some people have had enough and ask themselves why they should pay beyond such a premium, when in practical terms, it makes no difference," says Colin.
 

Saturday, September 18, 2010

Springhill - Cluster Housing


Springhill is a 99-year leasehold cluster-housing development located at 2 Sembawang Walk, Singapore 757616, in District 27, minutes away from Sembawang MRT Station. Completed in 2005, it comprises 115units. Both Northpoint and Sembawang Shopping Centre are located in the vicinity.

Condo Amenities near Springhill

With Springhill’s close proximity to Yishun Town Centre, there are a host of amenities available including the aforementioned Northpoint, supermarkets, restaurants and eating establishments, banks, cinema, library, and an upcoming hospital.

Schools are mostly a short drive from Springhill, including Yishun Town Secondary School and Ahmad Ibrahim Primary. Sembawang Beach is also just minutes drive away.

For vehicle owners, driving to either the business hub or the Orchard Road shopping belt takes 20-25 minutes, via Central Expressway.
Development Name:Springhill
Property Type:Terraced House
Developer:Far East Organization
Tenure:99-year Leasehold
Completion Year:2008
# of Floors:3
 
Property Facilities:
  • BBQ pits
  • Clubhouse
  • Gymnasium room
  • Swimming pool
  • Wading pool
**Visit chorkim.goh.virtualhomes.sg for more listings**

Friday, September 17, 2010

DALLA VALE - for immediate occupation

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Not penalising private home owners - Instead, says Mah Bow Tan, Govt making things more equitable for both them and HDB flat owners, alike

by Esther Ng

SINGAPORE - The recent cooling measures have resulted in an "anomaly", Non-Constituency MP Sylvia Lim told Parliament yesterday, noting that while a Housing and Development Board (HDB) flat owner can own private property after the Minimum Occupation Period (MOP), but a private property owner has to sell his property within six months of buying an HDB flat.

In response, Minister for National Development Mah Bow Tan said the Government was not penalising private property owners but making it more "equitable" for both HDB and private property owners.

He pointed out that in the past, subsidised HDB flat owners could not buy private property until after five years, whereas a private property owner could own both private and HDB properties at the same time.

Mr Lim Biow Chuan, MP for Marine Parade GRC, wanted to know why private property owners who bought HDB flats, after the new rules kicked in, would have to dispose their private property when they intended to live in their HDB flats during the MOP of five years.

Mr Mah said there were people who wanted to "have the best of both worlds" - keeping their private property and renting it out while living in an HDB flat. However, he added that there was "a genuine need from first-timer couples for HDB resale flats and I think we should let them have first crack at it".

About 3 per cent of HDB flat owners - or 24,000 flat owners - own both private property and HDB flats.

Mr Mah added: "If you already own private property, please don't, at this point in time, compete with the others to buy HDB resale unless you are genuinely downgrading."

The Minister said many flat owners caught up in the "upgrading fever" in the nineties were hit by the financial crisis.

Mr Mah reiterated that the new measures did not disadvantage upgraders or investors as there was ample public and private housing supply in the pipeline. The measures were timely to encourage them to exercise greater financial prudence and think carefully about their purchases, he said.

As for MP for West Coast GRC Ho Geok Choo's question on whether there would be enough executive condominiums (ECs) and flats under the Design, Build and Sell Scheme (DBSS) to cater to the needs of those with a monthly income of $8,000 to $10,000, Mr Mah said HDB was ramping up the supply of land sites for DBSS and ECs.

HDB plans to release land sites for about 7,000 DBSS flats and 8,000 ECs in 2010 and 2011.

In two years, HDB will triple the current stock of 4,000 DBSS flats and double the current stock of 10,000 ECs that have been launched for public sale since the start of the scheme.

New HDB rule on overseas home ownership raises questions

by Conrad Raj

The recent measures by the Government to prevent a property bubble in Singapore are generally welcome.

However, like all such measures, they sometimes appear to have unintended effects. In some cases, they may appear to affect people who probably were never meant to be the target of those measures.

Take the case of those who own private property not in Singapore but abroad. According to the new rules, a person who buys a non-subsidised public housing flat after the end of last month can only purchase a private property after living in the HDB apartment for a minimum of five years.

Those now own private properties and want to buy a HDB flat will have to sell their private property within six months of their HDB purchase. It does not matter if the private property is here or abroad.

Those who fail to declare their ownership of private properties or make a false declaration face fines of up to $5,000 or a prison term of up to six months, or both. The HDB can also compulsorily acquire its property if it discovers a false declaration has been made after the buyer takes possession of the flat. But many will get away with it for it is impossible or impractical to verify property ownership abroad.

Still, why penalise those having private properties abroad in the first place? How do these people compete for properties here? How are you going to attract foreign talent if they have to give up homes they may have to go back to one of these days - unless you intend to more or less imprison them here?

Not all foreign talent attract the kind of remuneration or pay packages that will allow them to buy or rent private property here. It may make more sense for these people to buy their own HDB flats. And as already reported, permanent residents who inherit properties overseas can also be placed in a quandary. Do you dispose of your inheritance, no matter what the sentimental value attached?

I know foreigners have been accused of driving property prices here sky high. But if you want to attract talent, you have to provide the infrastructure to accommodate them. The solution lies in building more flats, not in depriving them of what they own overseas.

While property prices here, both private and public, are generally expensive, a property in Malaysia or elsewhere abroad, including Australia may be relatively cheap - sometimes one third or less the cost of a four-room HDB flat here.

In fact I know of many friends who have properties in Perth or Malaysia which they use for vacations abroad. Now the new rules will not allow for such luxuries. Why?

One lady wrote in to the papers to say she had a small property in Malaysia which now houses her parents. And she had paid the option for a HDB flat here. Now she has to give up the option or leave her parents homeless. Were the rules meant for such cases?

What about retirement properties overseas? Do you have to live five years in an HDB flat before deciding to invest in them? By then, those properties may be beyond your reach. Prices do not go up only in Singapore.

At one time, the Government itself was promoting property ownership as one of the best forms of investment. That was why it relaxed the rules on private property ownership for HDB flat owners. Now it has made a dramatic U-turn, even where there is no competition in the property market here.

How is owning overseas private property going to impact on local property prices? Perhaps the Government hopes to lower prices by keeping out a section of the population with private flats abroad. There must be quite a large number of people owning private property abroad for them to have an impact on property prices here and for the authorities to want to enforce the prohibitions.

For sure the HDB has said that it is prepared to exercise flexibility on a case by case basis, depending on the merits of each transaction. But you cannot make a property purchase in the hope that the case will have merit in the eyes of an official with subjective views. The rules on the exceptions must be clearly spelt out for all to know and act accordingly. If there is a rejection the reason must be given.

All too often here, things are rejected without any explanation although you may be allowed to apply again, not knowing why you were rejected in the first place. There must be greater transparency and people must be aware of the clear line of thought instead of thinking that the decision depended on the whims and fancies of the person in authority.


The writer is a Editor-At-Large at Today.


Visit http://chorkim.goh.virtualhomes.sg/ for property listings

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

CORAL ISLAND Bungalow FOR SALE 9460/10500 sqft Brand new!

*DAILY Vieiwng by Appt between 1pm - 5pm . Call / Sms +65 97938778 or email property@ckgroup.sg


Unblocked View of the Waterway
Inspired by nature itself, Coral Island blends natural form and human artistry to create a new aesthetic specifically tailored to the needs of those privileged and perceptive. The 21 splendidly appointed waterfront villas of Coral Island will showcase new standards of exclusivity, luxury and privacy.

The first integrated bungalow development on the pristine new waterfront district of Sentosa Cove, Coral Island has been specifically designed to meet the taste and requirements of those who demand nothing less than the very best.


Gracefully crafted by Award winning MAPS Design Studio, each meticulously detailed villa is the private backdrop for the unfolding of your varied lifestyle. Each villa will also be endowed with its own private infinity pool and berthing space. Internationally renowned landscape architect Bill Bensley has also injected an inspired sense of style with his artful designs that accentuate an already refined living environment.
Private Berth


New Landscaping ON the Way!

Saturday, September 4, 2010

Resale private homes on the rise


By Dominique Loh
Posted: 04 September 2010

SINGAPORE : Resale private properties are getting more popular with home buyers.
According to the latest data from the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA), one in two private homes sold this year is a resale unit, up from 30 per cent in 1997.

While the sale of new private homes remained strong in the first 7 months of the year, analysts said resale private properties are also changing hands at a faster rate.
Private resale units now make up 50 per cent of total private home sales, compared to 30 per cent 13 years ago.

"The resale (private property) market likely to continue ease upwards, we've seen that happening over the last few quarters, starting from Q3 of 2009. Median price for resale (property) has been easing up, averaging about 3-5 per cent per quarter. I think the trend will likely continue, (but) the rate of increase has slowed down a little," said Dr Chua Yang Liang, head of Research and Consultancy at Jones Lang Lasalle.

Analysts said new prime districts have emerged in the non-landed private resale market, displacing popular areas like Orchard Road, Bukit Timah and Thomson.

In the second quarter this year, median prices of private resale homes in the new Marina downtown and Tanjong Pagar of districts 1 and 2 respectively out-stripped those in the traditional prime districts.

Dr Chua said: "You're looking at the remaking of Singapore story that has taken a new form now. District 1 downtown area, and these projects (at) the Marina, The Sail... have actually moved prices. Downtown living has caught on for the last few years, gathered momentum now, and it's likely to continue.

"What's prime in Singapore now is more diverse, it's a sign of a maturing real estate market," he added.
Industry players said the recent property cooling measures will affect the sales of new private homes and resale units.
But some analysts believe resale properties offer better value if buyers are priced out by newer projects.

Other experts said there's also an upside potential of adding value to an old unit through renovations.
"If you buy a single storey, 20-year-old landed property, there's a potential for you to adapt, reuse, and refurbish it into a two-storey development. Through the value-add process, you will be able to gain much higher capital appreciation, versus a project under construction," said Donald Han, Regional MD of Cushman and Wakefield. - CNA

  • Coral Island Bungalow for sale
  • Sentosa Properties for sale (various units)
  • Marina Bay Residences for Sale/Rent (various units)
Visit http://chorkim.goh.virtualhomes.sg/ for more listings. Referral / Cobroke most welcome!

Friday, September 3, 2010

Property in Singapore: Sentosa Bungalow for Sale

Property in Singapore: Sentosa Bungalow for Sale: "New Landscaping on the way Its all about Lifestyle.. why not on a small island to almost call your own? Brand New 9450 / 10500 sqft w..."

Sentosa Bungalow for Sale



New Landscaping on the way
Its all about Lifestyle.. why not on a small island to almost call your own?

Brand New 9450 / 10500 sqft with extra additions fitted. Will come with new landscapng too. This prestigious bungalow comes with a feature pool and a private berth with no blockage. View to appreciate this choice unit. Viewing by appt between 1pm - 5pm daily. Call/SMS +65 97938778 or email me at property@ckgroup.sg today!



Private Berth
Unblocked View